09-26-2006, 04:05 AM
|
#11
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 110
|
Newcastle
Em Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:16:49 -0300, Gareth <gareth47@btinternet.com>
escreveu:
Quote:
"Chris F" <chris@asifimtellingyoulot.com> wrote in message news:j9ggh294rm5t6c4067ang3d8ka78jokiu9@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:22:23 +0200, "Mr. Pink" <liverpoolkickass@anfield.co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
'The Edu Tor' wrote:> Em Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:00:35 -0300, Mr. Pink> <ToHellWithIdiotsWhoStarWars@earth.com> escreveu:>>> I`ve always seen Newcastle as a big club (it is probably the biggest>> supported club in England)??? Can someone PLEASE explain to me what>> is>> going on?>>>> I`ve been a liverpool supporter since I was five (and my 5`th>> birthday was on december 26`th in 1975) but since I was 12-13 I`ve>> looked at Newcastle as a very good club. Not that they`ve been in>> the>> top division all the way, but it has looked as a good club. I was>> just wondering what the board/owner have done wrong since they can`t>> make Newcastle a club to compete against the usual "top four" teams?>>>> I would love to see other teams "up there". I mean, I love liverpool,>> but if the same teams keep winning over and over again football gets>> boring....and I would hate to see football killing itself in the next>> 10 years by not doing something....>>>> Anyway, I hope the newcastle board wake up before it`s too late. Even>> I have a place in my heart for newcastle.. >>>> Pink>>> was it boring when Arsenal, Liverpool and Machester were the only ones> to win it?> I don't feel bored with Chelsea winning! ;-)> But it is boring when chelsea win it the way they are. In three years uefa have said the new rule is coming, no matter what. The rule where the clubs can`t spend more money than they make, so it really doesn`t matter how much money Roman or any other rich owner has got, if they club make 10 pounds, that`s what you can spend. Great. Smaller clubs with a chance to win. I`ve always looked forward to the premiership season, to get away from the somewhat amateur norwegian league. This year I`ve kept following the norwegian league. I can`t name the top three teams at the table this season. It has gotten so boring, cus you know who`ll win in the end anyway. Money plays too big a role in deciding the title, and that is something I don`t like. It\s much more fun if Grimsby get promoted though. Pink
|
that rule is to do with wages, and it is supposedly something like the wage bill can be no more than 50% of the annual income. it won't make any difference to how much cash the clubs already have in the bank, nor the way they buy players with it, just the wages they can subsequently offer them. unless theyve changed it again, which is always possible with UEFA. --
|
Ed chelsea bought there success, but bought it more than any other team. I feel bored of chelsea winning already due to moanrinho's sheer arrogance that he is the best in the world and that what he says goes. Rather than this wage structure or spending as much as you earn why cant they just implement rules like in german football where you have to include so many home grown players and so many home grown players of a certain age and only a certain amount of imports. Because in all honestly it is getting boring. First it was manure now its chelsea and it'll be another team after them.
|
Gary, I can agreed limits should be added, but I don't accept the argument
that now is boring
It was boring when only Kops could win it, when only Devils could win it,
when Gunners ...
remember that for a long period only cash splash Rovers broke the line
So the problem is old, not just 'Chelsky' as you say
Mourinho is a sum of what you are used to have
Wengers moaning
Fergusons arrogance
Bobby geniously
and speaks my language! ;-D
--
The Edu Tor
S.E. Palmeiras - 92 years!
Chelsea F.C. - running for the third!
Usando o revolucionário cliente de correio do Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
|
|
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 06:55 AM
|
#12
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 115
|
Newcastle
"Hamish" <jockspam@dsl.WIBBLE.pipex.com> skrev i melding
news:45182e8f$0$97243$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readf reenews.net...
Quote:
Mr. Pink wrote:
Quote:
'The Edu Tor' wrote:
Quote:
|
was it boring when Arsenal, Liverpool and Machester were the only ones to win it? I don't feel bored with Chelsea winning! ;-)
|
But it is boring when chelsea win it the way they are. In three years uefa have said the new rule is coming, no matter what. The rule where the clubs can`t spend more money than they make, so it really doesn`t matter how much money Roman or any other rich owner has got, if they club make 10 pounds, that`s what you can spend. Great. Smaller clubs with a chance to win. I`ve always looked forward to the premiership season, to get away from the somewhat amateur norwegian league. This year I`ve kept following the norwegian league. I can`t name the top three teams at the table this season. It has gotten so boring, cus you know who`ll win in the end anyway. Money plays too big a role in deciding the title, and that is something I don`t like. It\s much more fun if Grimsby get promoted though. Pink
|
I thought the ruling ony applied to wages? Surely a club would FIFA/UEFA to court if told it couldn't spend all it's millions in the bank on new players, if they wanted too.
|
I think saved money in the bank is allowed to be spent on whatever they
want....but I`m not sure how this will work. Anyway, it would be great if
more teams could compete on equal terms.
Quote:
|
-- Hamish "It only takes a room of Americans for the British and Australians to realise how much we have in common."
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 06:57 AM
|
#13
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 115
|
Newcastle
"'The Edu Tor'" <team_creator@agcm> skrev i melding
news  p.tgf8mzgckg5p3r@uniship-dd81275...
Quote:
Em Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:22:23 -0300, Mr. Pink <liverpoolkickass@anfield.co.uk> escreveu:
Quote:
'The Edu Tor' wrote:
Quote:
|
Em Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:00:35 -0300, Mr. Pink <ToHellWithIdiotsWhoStarWars@earth.com> escreveu:> I`ve always seen Newcastle as a big club (it is probably the biggest> supported club in England)??? Can someone PLEASE explain to me what is> going on?>> I`ve been a liverpool supporter since I was five (and my 5`th birthday> was on december 26`th in 1975) but since I was 12-13 I`ve looked at> Newcastle as a very good club. Not that they`ve been in the top> division all the way, but it has looked as a good club. I was just> wondering what the board/owner have done wrong since they can`t make> Newcastle a club to compete against the usual "top four" teams?>> I would love to see other teams "up there". I mean, I love liverpool,> but if the same teams keep winning over and over again football gets> boring....and I would hate to see football killing itself in the next> 10 years by not doing something....>> Anyway, I hope the newcastle board wake up before it`s too late. Even> I have a place in my heart for newcastle..>> Pink was it boring when Arsenal, Liverpool and Machester were the only ones to win it? I don't feel bored with Chelsea winning! ;-)
|
But it is boring when chelsea win it the way they are. In three years uefa have said the new rule is coming, no matter what. The rule where the clubs can`t spend more money than they make, so it really doesn`t matter how much money Roman or any other rich owner has got, if they club make 10 pounds, that`s what you can spend. Great. Smaller clubs with a chance to win. I`ve always looked forward to the premiership season, to get away from the somewhat amateur norwegian league. This year I`ve kept following the norwegian league. I can`t name the top three teams at the table this season. It has gotten so boring, cus you know who`ll win in the end anyway. Money plays too big a role in deciding the title, and that is something I don`t like. It\s much more fun if Grimsby get promoted though. Pink
|
Manchester, Real Madrid and AC Milan will love the rule that will eternize (spl) their dominance the big marketing teams will rule alone no more Portsmouth to come... think before diggest
|
But those clubs will have much money because the supporters...and noe some
investment agency or rich bastards decides "This club will be the richest
club and buy all the best players". As a liverpool supporter I would rather
see man utd being no 1 because they are a well supported club all over the
world and they earn their money as a football club...
Quote:
|
-- The Edu Tor S.E. Palmeiras - 92 years! Chelsea F.C. - running for the third! Usando o revolucionário cliente de correio do Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 06:58 AM
|
#14
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 115
|
Newcastle
"Chris F" <chris@asifimtellingyoulot.com> skrev i melding
news:j9ggh294rm5t6c4067ang3d8ka78jokiu9@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:22:23 +0200, "Mr. Pink" <liverpoolkickass@anfield.co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
'The Edu Tor' wrote:
Quote:
|
Em Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:00:35 -0300, Mr. Pink <ToHellWithIdiotsWhoStarWars@earth.com> escreveu:> I`ve always seen Newcastle as a big club (it is probably the biggest> supported club in England)??? Can someone PLEASE explain to me what is> going on?>> I`ve been a liverpool supporter since I was five (and my 5`th> birthday was on december 26`th in 1975) but since I was 12-13 I`ve> looked at Newcastle as a very good club. Not that they`ve been in the> top division all the way, but it has looked as a good club. I was> just wondering what the board/owner have done wrong since they can`t> make Newcastle a club to compete against the usual "top four" teams?>> I would love to see other teams "up there". I mean, I love liverpool,> but if the same teams keep winning over and over again football gets> boring....and I would hate to see football killing itself in the next> 10 years by not doing something....>> Anyway, I hope the newcastle board wake up before it`s too late. Even> I have a place in my heart for newcastle..>> Pink was it boring when Arsenal, Liverpool and Machester were the only ones to win it? I don't feel bored with Chelsea winning! ;-)
|
But it is boring when chelsea win it the way they are. In three yearsuefa have said the new rule is coming, no matter what. The rule wherethe clubs can`t spend more money than they make, so it really doesn`tmatter how much money Roman or any other rich owner has got, if theyclub make 10 pounds, that`s what you can spend. Great. Smaller clubswith a chance to win. I`ve always looked forward to the premiershipseason, to get away from the somewhat amateur norwegian league. Thisyear I`ve kept following the norwegian league. I can`t name the topthree teams at the table this season. It has gotten so boring, cus youknow who`ll win in the end anyway. Money plays too big a role indeciding the title, and that is something I don`t like. It\s much morefun if Grimsby get promoted though.Pink
|
that rule is to do with wages, and it is supposedly something like the wage bill can be no more than 50% of the annual income. it won't make any difference to how much cash the clubs already have in the bank, nor the way they buy players with it, just the wages they can subsequently offer them. unless theyve changed it again, which is always possible with UEFA. --
|
They did change it cus they found out that wages can be payed by outside
investors.... I guess there will
be a million other changes as well....
|
|
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 06:59 AM
|
#15
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 115
|
Newcastle
"'The Edu Tor'" <team_creator@agcm> skrev i melding
news p.tghijexekg5p3r@uniship-dd81275...
Quote:
Em Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:16:49 -0300, Gareth <gareth47@btinternet.com> escreveu:
Quote:
"Chris F" <chris@asifimtellingyoulot.com> wrote in message news:j9ggh294rm5t6c4067ang3d8ka78jokiu9@4ax.com...
Quote:
|
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:22:23 +0200, "Mr. Pink" <liverpoolkickass@anfield.co.uk> wrote:> 'The Edu Tor' wrote:>> Em Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:00:35 -0300, Mr. Pink>> <ToHellWithIdiotsWhoStarWars@earth.com> escreveu:>>>>> I`ve always seen Newcastle as a big club (it is probably the biggest>>> supported club in England)??? Can someone PLEASE explain to me what>>> is>>> going on?>>>>>> I`ve been a liverpool supporter since I was five (and my 5`th>>> birthday was on december 26`th in 1975) but since I was 12-13 I`ve>>> looked at Newcastle as a very good club. Not that they`ve been in>>> the>>> top division all the way, but it has looked as a good club. I was>>> just wondering what the board/owner have done wrong since they can`t>>> make Newcastle a club to compete against the usual "top four" teams?>>>>>> I would love to see other teams "up there". I mean, I love liverpool,>>> but if the same teams keep winning over and over again football gets>>> boring....and I would hate to see football killing itself in the next>>> 10 years by not doing something....>>>>>> Anyway, I hope the newcastle board wake up before it`s too late. Even>>> I have a place in my heart for newcastle..>>>>>> Pink>>>>>> was it boring when Arsenal, Liverpool and Machester were the only ones>> to win it?>> I don't feel bored with Chelsea winning! ;-)>>>> But it is boring when chelsea win it the way they are. In three years> uefa have said the new rule is coming, no matter what. The rule where> the clubs can`t spend more money than they make, so it really doesn`t> matter how much money Roman or any other rich owner has got, if they> club make 10 pounds, that`s what you can spend. Great. Smaller clubs> with a chance to win. I`ve always looked forward to the premiership> season, to get away from the somewhat amateur norwegian league. This> year I`ve kept following the norwegian league. I can`t name the top> three teams at the table this season. It has gotten so boring, cus you> know who`ll win in the end anyway. Money plays too big a role in> deciding the title, and that is something I don`t like. It\s much more> fun if Grimsby get promoted though.>> Pink that rule is to do with wages, and it is supposedly something like the wage bill can be no more than 50% of the annual income. it won't make any difference to how much cash the clubs already have in the bank, nor the way they buy players with it, just the wages they can subsequently offer them. unless theyve changed it again, which is always possible with UEFA. --
|
Ed chelsea bought there success, but bought it more than any other team. I feel bored of chelsea winning already due to moanrinho's sheer arrogance that he is the best in the world and that what he says goes. Rather than this wage structure or spending as much as you earn why cant they just implement rules like in german football where you have to include so many home grown players and so many home grown players of a certain age and only a certain amount of imports. Because in all honestly it is getting boring. First it was manure now its chelsea and it'll be another team after them.
|
Gary, I can agreed limits should be added, but I don't accept the argument that now is boring It was boring when only Kops could win it,
|
Tell me how many times Liverpool have won the league 3 times in a row
then....
Pink
when only Devils could win it,
Quote:
|
when Gunners ... remember that for a long period only cash splash Rovers broke the line So the problem is old, not just 'Chelsky' as you say Mourinho is a sum of what you are used to have Wengers moaning Fergusons arrogance Bobby geniously and speaks my language! ;-D -- The Edu Tor S.E. Palmeiras - 92 years! Chelsea F.C. - running for the third! Usando o revolucionário cliente de correio do Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 07:08 AM
|
#16
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 110
|
Newcastle
Em Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:59:38 -0300, Mr. Pink
<liverpoolrosenborgnardoforfarrangerswerdervalencia @crewegrimsbykidderminsterstoke.no>
escreveu:
Quote:
"'The Edu Tor'" <team_creator@agcm> skrev i melding newsp.tghijexekg5p3r@uniship-dd81275...
Quote:
Em Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:16:49 -0300, Gareth <gareth47@btinternet.com> escreveu:
Quote:
|
"Chris F" <chris@asifimtellingyoulot.com> wrote in message news:j9ggh294rm5t6c4067ang3d8ka78jokiu9@4ax.com... > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:22:23 +0200, "Mr. Pink"> <liverpoolkickass@anfield.co.uk> wrote:>>> 'The Edu Tor' wrote:>>> Em Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:00:35 -0300, Mr. Pink>>> <ToHellWithIdiotsWhoStarWars@earth.com> escreveu:>>>>>>> I`ve always seen Newcastle as a big club (it is probably the>>>> biggest>>>> supported club in England)??? Can someone PLEASE explain to me>>>> what>>>> is>>>> going on?>>>>>>>> I`ve been a liverpool supporter since I was five (and my 5`th>>>> birthday was on december 26`th in 1975) but since I was 12-13 I`ve>>>> looked at Newcastle as a very good club. Not that they`ve been in>>>> the>>>> top division all the way, but it has looked as a good club. I was>>>> just wondering what the board/owner have done wrong since they>>>> can`t>>>> make Newcastle a club to compete against the usual "top four">>>> teams?>>>>>>>> I would love to see other teams "up there". I mean, I love>>>> liverpool,>>>> but if the same teams keep winning over and over again football>>>> gets>>>> boring....and I would hate to see football killing itself in the>>>> next>>>> 10 years by not doing something....>>>>>>>> Anyway, I hope the newcastle board wake up before it`s too late.>>>> Even>>>> I have a place in my heart for newcastle..>>>>>>>> Pink>>>>>>>>> was it boring when Arsenal, Liverpool and Machester were the only>>> ones>>> to win it?>>> I don't feel bored with Chelsea winning! ;-)>>>>>>> But it is boring when chelsea win it the way they are. In three years>> uefa have said the new rule is coming, no matter what. The rule where>> the clubs can`t spend more money than they make, so it really doesn`t>> matter how much money Roman or any other rich owner has got, if they>> club make 10 pounds, that`s what you can spend. Great. Smaller clubs>> with a chance to win. I`ve always looked forward to the premiership>> season, to get away from the somewhat amateur norwegian league. This>> year I`ve kept following the norwegian league. I can`t name the top>> three teams at the table this season. It has gotten so boring, cus>> you>> know who`ll win in the end anyway. Money plays too big a role in>> deciding the title, and that is something I don`t like. It\s much>> more>> fun if Grimsby get promoted though.>>>> Pink>> that rule is to do with wages, and it is supposedly something like the> wage bill can be no more than 50% of the annual income. it won't make> any difference to how much cash the clubs already have in the bank,> nor the way they buy players with it, just the wages they can> subsequently offer them.>> unless theyve changed it again, which is always possible with UEFA.> -- Ed chelsea bought there success, but bought it more than any other team. I feel bored of chelsea winning already due to moanrinho's sheer arrogance that he is the best in the world and that what he says goes. Rather than this wage structure or spending as much as you earn why cant they just implement rules like in german football where you have to include so many home grown players and so many home grown players of a certain age and only a certain amount of imports. Because in all honestly it is getting boring. First it was manure now its chelsea and it'll be another team after them.
|
Gary, I can agreed limits should be added, but I don't accept the argument that now is boring It was boring when only Kops could win it,
|
Tell me how many times Liverpool have won the league 3 times in a row then.... Pink
|
so your problem is with rows? ;-)
if they agree to win it each two years in the next 20 t is ok for you?
oh dear...
--
The Edu Tor
S.E. Palmeiras - 92 years!
Chelsea F.C. - running for the third!
Usando o revolucionário cliente de correio do Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
|
|
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 08:17 AM
|
#17
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 115
|
Newcastle
"'The Edu Tor'" <team_creator@agcm> skrev i melding
news p.tghq0znikg5p3r@uniship-dd81275...
Quote:
Em Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:59:38 -0300, Mr. Pink <liverpoolrosenborgnardoforfarrangerswerdervalencia @crewegrimsbykidderminsterstoke.no> escreveu:
Quote:
"'The Edu Tor'" <team_creator@agcm> skrev i melding newsp.tghijexekg5p3r@uniship-dd81275...
Quote:
|
Em Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:16:49 -0300, Gareth <gareth47@btinternet.com> escreveu:>> "Chris F" <chris@asifimtellingyoulot.com> wrote in message> news:j9ggh294rm5t6c4067ang3d8ka78jokiu9@4ax.com... >> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:22:23 +0200, "Mr. Pink">> <liverpoolkickass@anfield.co.uk> wrote:>>>>> 'The Edu Tor' wrote:>>>> Em Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:00:35 -0300, Mr. Pink>>>> <ToHellWithIdiotsWhoStarWars@earth.com> escreveu:>>>>>>>>> I`ve always seen Newcastle as a big club (it is probably the>>>>> biggest>>>>> supported club in England)??? Can someone PLEASE explain to me>>>>> what>>>>> is>>>>> going on?>>>>>>>>>> I`ve been a liverpool supporter since I was five (and my 5`th>>>>> birthday was on december 26`th in 1975) but since I was 12-13 I`ve>>>>> looked at Newcastle as a very good club. Not that they`ve been in>>>>> the>>>>> top division all the way, but it has looked as a good club. I was>>>>> just wondering what the board/owner have done wrong since they>>>>> can`t>>>>> make Newcastle a club to compete against the usual "top four">>>>> teams?>>>>>>>>>> I would love to see other teams "up there". I mean, I love>>>>> liverpool,>>>>> but if the same teams keep winning over and over again football>>>>> gets>>>>> boring....and I would hate to see football killing itself in the>>>>> next>>>>> 10 years by not doing something....>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, I hope the newcastle board wake up before it`s too late.>>>>> Even>>>>> I have a place in my heart for newcastle..>>>>>>>>>> Pink>>>>>>>>>>>> was it boring when Arsenal, Liverpool and Machester were the only>>>> ones>>>> to win it?>>>> I don't feel bored with Chelsea winning! ;-)>>>>>>>>>> But it is boring when chelsea win it the way they are. In three years>>> uefa have said the new rule is coming, no matter what. The rule where>>> the clubs can`t spend more money than they make, so it really doesn`t>>> matter how much money Roman or any other rich owner has got, if they>>> club make 10 pounds, that`s what you can spend. Great. Smaller clubs>>> with a chance to win. I`ve always looked forward to the premiership>>> season, to get away from the somewhat amateur norwegian league. This>>> year I`ve kept following the norwegian league. I can`t name the top>>> three teams at the table this season. It has gotten so boring, cus>>> you>>> know who`ll win in the end anyway. Money plays too big a role in>>> deciding the title, and that is something I don`t like. It\s much>>> more>>> fun if Grimsby get promoted though.>>>>>> Pink>>>> that rule is to do with wages, and it is supposedly something like the>> wage bill can be no more than 50% of the annual income. it won't make>> any difference to how much cash the clubs already have in the bank,>> nor the way they buy players with it, just the wages they can>> subsequently offer them.>>>> unless theyve changed it again, which is always possible with UEFA.>> -->> Ed chelsea bought there success, but bought it more than any other> team.> I> feel bored of chelsea winning already due to moanrinho's sheer> arrogance> that he is the best in the world and that what he says goes. Rather> than> this wage structure or spending as much as you earn why cant they just> implement rules like in german football where you have to include so> many> home grown players and so many home grown players of a certain age and> only> a certain amount of imports. Because in all honestly it is getting> boring.> First it was manure now its chelsea and it'll be another team after> them.>> Gary, I can agreed limits should be added, but I don't accept the argument that now is boring It was boring when only Kops could win it,
|
Tell me how many times Liverpool have won the league 3 times in a row then.... Pink
|
so your problem is with rows? ;-) if they agree to win it each two years in the next 20 t is ok for you? oh dear...
|
You`re missing the point. It was competition for the title. Liverpool didn\t
win it every year, they didn`t have more money than the other clubs. The
other clubs were competing on equal terms. The only difference was that
liverpool was an attractive club to play for therefor they got better
players.
These days only 2-3 clubs have the finances the win the league. Money
shouldn`t be what decides wether a club can win the trophy or not, but
unfortunately people think so. Not every league should be corrupt just
because some are...
Quote:
|
-- The Edu Tor S.E. Palmeiras - 92 years! Chelsea F.C. - running for the third! Usando o revolucionário cliente de correio do Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 09:33 AM
|
#18
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 110
|
Newcastle
Em Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:17:04 -0300, Mr. Pink
<liverpoolrosenborgnardoforfarrangerswerdervalencia @crewegrimsbykidderminsterstoke.no>
escreveu:
Quote:
"'The Edu Tor'" <team_creator@agcm> skrev i melding newsp.tghq0znikg5p3r@uniship-dd81275...
Quote:
Em Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:59:38 -0300, Mr. Pink <liverpoolrosenborgnardoforfarrangerswerdervalencia @crewegrimsbykidderminsterstoke.no> escreveu:
Quote:
|
"'The Edu Tor'" <team_creator@agcm> skrev i melding newsp.tghijexekg5p3r@uniship-dd81275...> Em Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:16:49 -0300, Gareth <gareth47@btinternet.com>> escreveu:>>>>> "Chris F" <chris@asifimtellingyoulot.com> wrote in message>> news:j9ggh294rm5t6c4067ang3d8ka78jokiu9@4ax.com... >>> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:22:23 +0200, "Mr. Pink">>> <liverpoolkickass@anfield.co.uk> wrote:>>>>>>> 'The Edu Tor' wrote:>>>>> Em Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:00:35 -0300, Mr. Pink>>>>> <ToHellWithIdiotsWhoStarWars@earth.com> escreveu:>>>>>>>>>>> I`ve always seen Newcastle as a big club (it is probably the>>>>>> biggest>>>>>> supported club in England)??? Can someone PLEASE explain to me>>>>>> what>>>>>> is>>>>>> going on?>>>>>>>>>>>> I`ve been a liverpool supporter since I was five (and my 5`th>>>>>> birthday was on december 26`th in 1975) but since I was 12-13>>>>>> I`ve>>>>>> looked at Newcastle as a very good club. Not that they`ve been>>>>>> in>>>>>> the>>>>>> top division all the way, but it has looked as a good club. I>>>>>> was>>>>>> just wondering what the board/owner have done wrong since they>>>>>> can`t>>>>>> make Newcastle a club to compete against the usual "top four">>>>>> teams?>>>>>>>>>>>> I would love to see other teams "up there". I mean, I love>>>>>> liverpool,>>>>>> but if the same teams keep winning over and over again football>>>>>> gets>>>>>> boring....and I would hate to see football killing itself in the>>>>>> next>>>>>> 10 years by not doing something....>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, I hope the newcastle board wake up before it`s too late.>>>>>> Even>>>>>> I have a place in my heart for newcastle..>>>>>>>>>>>> Pink>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was it boring when Arsenal, Liverpool and Machester were the only>>>>> ones>>>>> to win it?>>>>> I don't feel bored with Chelsea winning! ;-)>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it is boring when chelsea win it the way they are. In three>>>> years>>>> uefa have said the new rule is coming, no matter what. The rule>>>> where>>>> the clubs can`t spend more money than they make, so it really>>>> doesn`t>>>> matter how much money Roman or any other rich owner has got, if>>>> they>>>> club make 10 pounds, that`s what you can spend. Great. Smaller>>>> clubs>>>> with a chance to win. I`ve always looked forward to the premiership>>>> season, to get away from the somewhat amateur norwegian league.>>>> This>>>> year I`ve kept following the norwegian league. I can`t name the top>>>> three teams at the table this season. It has gotten so boring, cus>>>> you>>>> know who`ll win in the end anyway. Money plays too big a role in>>>> deciding the title, and that is something I don`t like. It\s much>>>> more>>>> fun if Grimsby get promoted though.>>>>>>>> Pink>>>>>> that rule is to do with wages, and it is supposedly something like>>> the>>> wage bill can be no more than 50% of the annual income. it won't>>> make>>> any difference to how much cash the clubs already have in the bank,>>> nor the way they buy players with it, just the wages they can>>> subsequently offer them.>>>>>> unless theyve changed it again, which is always possible with UEFA.>>> -->>>> Ed chelsea bought there success, but bought it more than any other>> team.>> I>> feel bored of chelsea winning already due to moanrinho's sheer>> arrogance>> that he is the best in the world and that what he says goes. Rather>> than>> this wage structure or spending as much as you earn why cant they>> just>> implement rules like in german football where you have to include so>> many>> home grown players and so many home grown players of a certain age>> and>> only>> a certain amount of imports. Because in all honestly it is getting>> boring.>> First it was manure now its chelsea and it'll be another team after>> them.>>>>>> Gary, I can agreed limits should be added, but I don't accept the> argument> that now is boring> It was boring when only Kops could win it, Tell me how many times Liverpool have won the league 3 times in a row then.... Pink
|
so your problem is with rows? ;-) if they agree to win it each two years in the next 20 t is ok for you? oh dear...
|
You`re missing the point. It was competition for the title. Liverpool didn\t win it every year, they didn`t have more money than the other clubs. The other clubs were competing on equal terms. The only difference was that liverpool was an attractive club to play for therefor they got better players. These days only 2-3 clubs have the finances the win the league. Money shouldn`t be what decides wether a club can win the trophy or not, but unfortunately people think so. Not every league should be corrupt just because some are...
|
me missing the point?
"Money shouldn`t be what decides wether a club can win the trophy or not?"
you just said that a club should run only with fans money
but the power aquired by giants would be controled how?
if you're Football God only 10 clubs would dominate football
--
The Edu Tor
S.E. Palmeiras - 92 years!
Chelsea F.C. - running for the third!
Usando o revolucionário cliente de correio do Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
|
|
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 10:16 AM
|
#19
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 74
|
Newcastle
"Mr. Pink" [SNIP]
Quote:
|
Gary, I can agreed limits should be added, but I don't accept the argument that now is boring It was boring when only Kops could win it, Tell me how many times Liverpool have won the league 3 times in a row then....
|
Well Chelsea's only won it twice in a row. I've got a gut feeling telling
me, they won't back it this year.
/Lars
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2006, 08:11 AM
|
#20
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 231
|
Newcastle
On the 24 Sep 2006, "Mr. Pink" <ToHellWithIdiotsWhoStarWars@earth.com>
wrote:
Quote:
|
I`ve always seen Newcastle as a big club (it is probably the biggest supported club in England)??? Can someone PLEASE explain to me what is going on?
|
All North-East clubs build the fans up to let them down. It's probably
something in the water.
--
Jades' First Encounters Site - http://www.jades.org/ffe.htm
The best Frontier: First Encounters site on the Web.
nospam@jades.org /is/ a real email address!
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|
|
|
Newcastle 
