Go Back   Games Forums > Games Category > Sony Playstation 2
User Name
Password


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Still want a PS3?
Old 10-05-2006, 10:20 AM   #21
Doug Jacobs
Junior Member
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,630
Default Still want a PS3?

In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 Technobarbarian <Technobarbarian-ztopzpam@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
How about my right to actually USE the media I bought?
If the license doesn't allow you to use the damn thing don't buy it. How hard is that? Your rights haven't changed. As the technology changes the licenses you buy are changing.


The problem is that these licenses are begining to infringe on local and
federal laws. Furthermore, many times, you can't even read the license
until you've open the package, or tried to install the thing. Many stores
won't accept returns on opened music or software. Even though the license
says you are entitled to your money back, the license is between you and
the company - not the store.
Quote:
How about my right to privacy?
If someone forced you to put this stuff on your machine you might have a point. If you make an agreement to give up privacy rights it's a personal choice and not a loss of rights.


Read about Sony's rootkit incident.

This was software that was installed on machines without the users'
knowledge or permission. As such, this actually violates some fledging
laws regarding computer privacy.

And as a special bonus, rootkit is very hard to remove fully, makes your
machine extremely unstable, AND also opened your computer to a number of
security exploits. All this, and you still aren't allowed to rip the CD -
which violates another federal law.

Oh yeah, and there was no indication on the package that the CD would
prevent you from ripping it, so people ended up trying to return what
they thought was a "defective" CD to stores - who only gave them an
exchange or store credit. Meanwhile, they unknowingly got to keep rootkit
free, as a "special gift" from Sony.
Quote:
How about my rights regarding not having companies disable/destroy my hardware?
This is a nice red herring. If anything that incident confirmed and strengthened your rights.


Strengthened my rights!? Where is it written that I have the right to
allow software companies to secretly install other programs on my PC as
they see fit - and that these secret programs may decrease system
performance or functionality?

How about the CD copy protection scheme that would crash your computer?
How does this strengthen my rights?

Phillips actually sued over that one, claiming the music publisher could
not use the "Audio CD" trademarks on a CD that clearly was outside the
spec.
Quote:
If the RIAA had its way, you'd have to _BUY_ different copies of music for each and every different player you had in your house. No, you wouldn't be allowed to make a copy of a CD for you to take in your car. No you couldn't make personal mix-discs. No, you couldn't rip the CD to MP3 for your MP3 player(s). No, you couldn't buy/sell used CDs. No, you couldn't lend your music to a friend, or even play it on his equipment.
And if you were stupid enough to buy this license you would deserve what you got.


And if it's the only game in town, are you willing to stop buying music
altogether?
Quote:
Does that sound good to you? I hope so, because that's what DRM is attempting to accomplish.
How much DRM do you think I buy? Idiots who buy stuff they don't like deserve what they get.


You're assuming that the companies will disclose what DRM (if any) they
are including on their products. In many of the existing examples - there
is no disclosure on the front of the package! If the companies refuse to
give you the proper information in the first place, how can you be
expected to make an educated choice?
  Reply With Quote

Still want a PS3?
Old 10-05-2006, 06:31 PM   #22
Technobarbarian
Junior Member
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4
Default Still want a PS3?


"Doug Jacobs" <djacobs@shell.rawbw.com> wrote in message
news:12iaj87h356qjd3@corp.supernews.com...
Quote:
In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 Technobarbarian <Technobarbarian-ztopzpam@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
How about my right to actually USE the media I bought? If the license doesn't allow you to use the damn thing don't buy it. How hard is that? Your rights haven't changed. As the technology changes the licenses you buy are changing.
The problem is that these licenses are begining to infringe on local and federal laws. Furthermore, many times, you can't even read the license until you've open the package, or tried to install the thing. Many stores won't accept returns on opened music or software. Even though the license says you are entitled to your money back, the license is between you and the company - not the store.
Quote:
How about my right to privacy? If someone forced you to put this stuff on your machine you might have a point. If you make an agreement to give up privacy rights it's a personal choice and not a loss of rights.
Read about Sony's rootkit incident.


Isolated incident - red herring
Quote:
This was software that was installed on machines without the users' knowledge or permission. As such, this actually violates some fledging laws regarding computer privacy.


Exactly my point, your rights have not been reduced.
Quote:
And as a special bonus, rootkit is very hard to remove fully, makes your machine extremely unstable, AND also opened your computer to a number of security exploits. All this, and you still aren't allowed to rip the CD - which violates another federal law. Oh yeah, and there was no indication on the package that the CD would prevent you from ripping it, so people ended up trying to return what they thought was a "defective" CD to stores - who only gave them an exchange or store credit.


Smart consumers learn from these experiences. The first time this
happens shame on them. The second time shame on you.

Meanwhile, they unknowingly got to keep rootkit
Quote:
free, as a "special gift" from Sony.
Quote:
How about my rights regarding not having companies disable/destroy my hardware? This is a nice red herring. If anything that incident confirmed and strengthened your rights.
Strengthened my rights!? Where is it written that I have the right to allow software companies to secretly install other programs on my PC as they see fit - and that these secret programs may decrease system performance or functionality? How about the CD copy protection scheme that would crash your computer? How does this strengthen my rights? Phillips actually sued over that one, claiming the music publisher could not use the "Audio CD" trademarks on a CD that clearly was outside the spec.
Quote:
If the RIAA had its way, you'd have to _BUY_ different copies of music for each and every different player you had in your house. No, you wouldn't be allowed to make a copy of a CD for you to take in your car. No you couldn't make personal mix-discs. No, you couldn't rip the CD to MP3 for your MP3 player(s). No, you couldn't buy/sell used CDs. No, you couldn't lend your music to a friend, or even play it on his equipment. And if you were stupid enough to buy this license you would deserve what you got.
And if it's the only game in town, are you willing to stop buying music altogether?


I'm sorry. I assumed you live on planet Earth. Here we have LOTS of
choices. I can't speak for your planet.
Quote:
Quote:
Does that sound good to you? I hope so, because that's what DRM is attempting to accomplish. How much DRM do you think I buy? Idiots who buy stuff they don't like deserve what they get.
You're assuming that the companies will disclose what DRM (if any) they are including on their products. In many of the existing examples - there is no disclosure on the front of the package! If the companies refuse to give you the proper information in the first place, how can you be expected to make an educated choice?


Easy, after the first purchase of this sort you have been educated.
Those who are too slow to learn their lesson are fair game.

I'n not saying the media industry isn't acting like a bunch of
assholes. I am saying that at this point your "rights" are intact. I've got
a lot of copyrighted material in my house. The way I use it has not changed.
If you don't like the way you're being treated don't buy the crap, but
whining about "rights" isn't going to get you anywhere.

TB


  Reply With Quote

Still want a PS3?
Old 10-11-2006, 01:33 PM   #23
Doug Jacobs
Junior Member
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,630
Default Still want a PS3?

In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 Technobarbarian <Technobarbarian-ztopzpam@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Read about Sony's rootkit incident.
Isolated incident - red herring


It's a perfect example though. In order to exercise my rights to play the
CD on my PC, I would have to have this software installed on my PC - with
out my knowledge. Had Sony informed consumers up front what software was
going to be installed and what its purpose was, those who still chose to
install it would at least be making a conscious decision to do so.
Quote:
This was software that was installed on machines without the users' knowledge or permission. As such, this actually violates some fledging laws regarding computer privacy.
Exactly my point, your rights have not been reduced.


Why, because Sony isn't the government? You are aware that private
entities are perfectly capable of violating laws and private rights.
Quote:
Oh yeah, and there was no indication on the package that the CD would prevent you from ripping it, so people ended up trying to return what they thought was a "defective" CD to stores - who only gave them an exchange or store credit.
Smart consumers learn from these experiences. The first time this happens shame on them. The second time shame on you.


So, if you're not reading all the latest tech news everyday, then shame on
you? Sure, I'm a technology geek. I read the web, try to keep myself up
to date on new technology and such, but I also think it's unreasonable to
expect everyone else to do the same thing. What, you're going to tell
your mother whose computer just got pwned due to the rootkit "Shame on you
for not knowing about Sony's Rootkit, ma!"

And even though I do try to keep current, I still think it's unreasonable
that I even have to be AWARE of such things. Why do I have to know how to
edit my Windows' Registry just so I can "fix" what other companies'
products break? Why do I have to know how to scribble on the backs of CDs
with a sharpie because some lame company thought it'd be keen if they
tried to stop me from using the CD in an intended method?

Do you agree that people should be allowed to use the technology without
having to spend hours and hours poring over technical manuals and articles
and such? I drive a car. I don't know entirely how the car works, nor
would I know how to fix it. That's why I take it to a mechanic. But by
your argument, you think we should all become professional mechanics?
That's completely unreasonable.

Even today there's news about the latest ploy to try to make DVDs
unplayable on computer DVD players. Sure, there's a hack already, but I
find it more and more tiring that I have to continually fight this war
against the stupid media companies just to use the license I legitimately
purchased from them in the first place.

Yeah, sure, there's always the ultimate option - just stop buying media
altogether. At the rate things are going, that's looking more and more
attractive.
Quote:
And if it's the only game in town, are you willing to stop buying music altogether?
I'm sorry. I assumed you live on planet Earth. Here we have LOTS of choices. I can't speak for your planet.


Other than not buying the product, what are these "choices" you speak of?
If someone wanted a CD published by Sony, it's not as if they can go
across the street to, say, Virgin and ask them to press you a copy.

iTunes or something similar (but still legal)? You assume that the music
in question is actually available. Not all of the publishers have
embraced the online world.

So that leaves either illegal downloads or other forms of piracy. Not
really an option, and, will just play into the hands of the RIAA and MPAA
who claim it's because of piracy that publishers NEED to put more and more
restrictive DRM on their products. It makes sense in a twisted way. They
certainly can't do a whole lot to the folks who are pirating their work,
but they can certainly make their legitimate customers suffer...oh
yes...make them suffer a lot...
Quote:
Easy, after the first purchase of this sort you have been educated. Those who are too slow to learn their lesson are fair game.


Again, you presume that the consumer has to basically become a technophile
in order to learn about these things in the first place. Even then, the
longer term effects of having Starforce on your machine took weeks, even
months, to manifest. Even if you were a PC mechanic, the LAST thing
you'd normally suspect is that game you deleted off your HDD last week...

Yes, now we know. Fortunatly, I didn't lose any hardware to Starforce,
but I know friends who did, not to mention the hours and hours they spent
trying to fix their machine due to a problem that shouldn't have even
occured in the first place.



  Reply With Quote

Still want a PS3?
Old 10-11-2006, 07:49 PM   #24
Technobarbarian
Junior Member
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4
Default Still want a PS3?


Ok, I've gotten completely bored with this thread for the simple reason
that none of you whiners seem to understand the word "rights". I do not know
how to make it any plainer. My interest in this subject is limited to one
issue: our rights. Do any of you fools know the meaning of the word? Do you
think rights just drop down from the sky and all of a sudden you have all of
these freakin' rights because you wish the world was organized that way.
Your fantasies do not interest me in the least. I am only interested in REAL
Freaking RIGHTS ----------------->RIGHTS<------------- not fantasies.

Now if my freakin' rights somehow magically changed how is it that the
way I use my music library has not changed?

"Doug Jacobs" <djacobs@shell.rawbw.com> wrote in message
news:12iqoq6ctcs2oe9@corp.supernews.com...
Quote:
In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 Technobarbarian <Technobarbarian-ztopzpam@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Read about Sony's rootkit incident. Isolated incident - red herring
It's a perfect example though.


No, it isn't. For the simple reason your that your *RIGHTS* did not
change. The legal system kicked in and worked as designed while your
*RIGHTS* were unchanged.


In order to exercise my rights to play the
Quote:
CD on my PC, I would have to have this software installed on my PC - with out my knowledge. Had Sony informed consumers up front what software was going to be installed and what its purpose was, those who still chose to install it would at least be making a conscious decision to do so.
Quote:
This was software that was installed on machines without the users' knowledge or permission. As such, this actually violates some fledging laws regarding computer privacy. Exactly my point, your rights have not been reduced.
Why, because Sony isn't the government? You are aware that private entities are perfectly capable of violating laws and private rights.
Quote:
Oh yeah, and there was no indication on the package that the CD would prevent you from ripping it, so people ended up trying to return what they thought was a "defective" CD to stores - who only gave them an exchange or store credit. Smart consumers learn from these experiences. The first time this happens shame on them. The second time shame on you.
So, if you're not reading all the latest tech news everyday, then shame on you? Sure, I'm a technology geek. I read the web, try to keep myself up to date on new technology and such, but I also think it's unreasonable to expect everyone else to do the same thing. What, you're going to tell your mother whose computer just got pwned due to the rootkit "Shame on you for not knowing about Sony's Rootkit, ma!" And even though I do try to keep current, I still think it's unreasonable that I even have to be AWARE of such things. Why do I have to know how to edit my Windows' Registry just so I can "fix" what other companies' products break? Why do I have to know how to scribble on the backs of CDs with a sharpie because some lame company thought it'd be keen if they tried to stop me from using the CD in an intended method? Do you agree that people should be allowed to use the technology without having to spend hours and hours poring over technical manuals and articles and such?


What in the world any of this whining has to do with your freakin'
rights changing completely escapes me. Are you claiming a right for
technology to be simple and easy for any fool to understand?

I drive a car. I don't know entirely how the car works, nor
Quote:
would I know how to fix it. That's why I take it to a mechanic. But by your argument, you think we should all become professional mechanics? That's completely unreasonable. Even today there's news about the latest ploy to try to make DVDs unplayable on computer DVD players. Sure, there's a hack already, but I find it more and more tiring that I have to continually fight this war against the stupid media companies just to use the license I legitimately purchased from them in the first place. Yeah, sure, there's always the ultimate option - just stop buying media altogether. At the rate things are going, that's looking more and more attractive.


No one holds a gun to your head and forces you to buy crap. Your rights
did not change. The technology changed. The licenses being sold changed.
Your freakin' rights remained the same.
Quote:
Quote:
And if it's the only game in town, are you willing to stop buying music altogether? I'm sorry. I assumed you live on planet Earth. Here we have LOTS of choices. I can't speak for your planet.
Other than not buying the product, what are these "choices" you speak of? If someone wanted a CD published by Sony, it's not as if they can go across the street to, say, Virgin and ask them to press you a copy.


Oh, you want a very specific and particular piece of crap. Well hell,
buy it, don't buy it, whatever. When in the hell did you get the right for
it to be sold with the license your little heart desires? You didn't. It's
Sony's property. They get to decide what to do with their property. It's
*their* right. If this changes they can whine about their rights changing.
Your ------------->RIGHTS<------------ have never included the right to do
whatever you want with Sony's property. You have never had the right to
demand the license you want.
Quote:
iTunes or something similar (but still legal)? You assume that the music in question is actually available. Not all of the publishers have embraced the online world.


Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
Quote:
So that leaves either illegal downloads or other forms of piracy. Not really an option, and, will just play into the hands of the RIAA and MPAA who claim it's because of piracy that publishers NEED to put more and more restrictive DRM on their products. It makes sense in a twisted way. They certainly can't do a whole lot to the folks who are pirating their work, but they can certainly make their legitimate customers suffer...oh yes...make them suffer a lot...
Quote:
Easy, after the first purchase of this sort you have been educated. Those who are too slow to learn their lesson are fair game.
Again, you presume that the consumer has to basically become a technophile in order to learn about these things in the first place. Even then, the longer term effects of having Starforce on your machine took weeks, even months, to manifest. Even if you were a PC mechanic, the LAST thing you'd normally suspect is that game you deleted off your HDD last week... Yes, now we know. Fortunatly, I didn't lose any hardware to Starforce, but I know friends who did, not to mention the hours and hours they spent trying to fix their machine due to a problem that shouldn't have even occured in the first place.


As yet another whiner has yet to show anywhere that their actual rights
have changed I am done with this thread.<period>

You morons really need to get a clue. As long as you continue to whine
about non-existant rights no one in their right head is going to take you
seriously. When you get around to talking about the rights you want you
might be able to make a sane case you can sell, but I doubt it. There is a
ton of good music out there. These days even street musicians are selling
CDs. If you gotta have that heavily promoted crap sold by major corporations
you either have to buy what they're willing to sell, try to talk your
congress critters into giving you new rights or look at other channels. As
long as you continue to use your dollars to vote for crap you're going to
get crap.

TB


  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Skin developed by: vBStyles.com

MyLounge.com Site Map
Forum: Cars, Cell Phone, Database, Games, Home Improvement, IT, Music, School, Sports, Web Design, Web Server, Weight Loss

The MyLounge.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for any advice. The information contained on MyLounge.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of MyLounge.com. MyLounge.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of MyLounge.com Term of Service