 |
28 to 30 fps in timedemo Radeon 9600 Pro, this good ?  |
 |
09-15-2004, 05:22 PM
|
#1
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 54
|
28 to 30 fps in timedemo Radeon 9600 Pro, this good ?
Resolution 1024 by 768, like this res not to small not to big.
Ive got it on medium quality and NO AF or AA, though not sure what
Doom 3 sets it at ?
Iam using the Humus tweaks as well as some other tweaks using the
Autoexec.cfg, my Vid card is also overclocked 23 before 28,30 after.
Was going to get a new card now i dont thing i need to
Using 4.9 offical ATI Catylast drivers.
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
 |
28 to 30 fps in timedemo Radeon 9600 Pro, this good ?  |
 |
09-16-2004, 04:22 PM
|
#2
|
|
Guest
|
28 to 30 fps in timedemo Radeon 9600 Pro, this good ?
Little TeaPot <Scully@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
Quote:
Resolution 1024 by 768, like this res not to small not to big.
Ive got it on medium quality and NO AF or AA, though not sure what Doom 3 sets it at ?
Iam using the Humus tweaks as well as some other tweaks using the Autoexec.cfg, my Vid card is also overclocked 23 before 28,30 after.
Was going to get a new card now i dont thing i need to 
Using 4.9 offical ATI Catylast drivers.
Cheers.
|
Yep. I get about 27-30 FPS at 1152x864 with high quality on my Athlon
2200+ XP, ATI Radeon 9800 Pro AIW (128 MB), 1 GB of RAM, etc. I still
get choppy FPS here and there though.
--
"Have I told you how much I like ants, huh? Especially fried in a
subtle blend of mech fluid and grated gears?" --Rampage to Inferno,
"Transmutate" in Transformers (Beast Wars)
/\___/\
/ /\ /\ \ Phillip (Ant) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx & http://aqfl.net
| |o o| | E-mail: philpi@earthlink.netANT or ANTant@zimage.com
\ _ / Nuke ANT from e-mail address if your e-mail was returned.
( )
|
|
|
|
 |
28 to 30 fps in timedemo Radeon 9600 Pro, this good ?  |
 |
09-17-2004, 08:04 AM
|
#3
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 40
|
28 to 30 fps in timedemo Radeon 9600 Pro, this good ?
I think it looks a lot better at 800*600 with 4xAA
<ANTant@zimage.com> wrote in message
news:2fmdnRf6b9DWs9fcRVn-qg@mminternet.net...
Quote:
Little TeaPot <Scully@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
Quote:
Resolution 1024 by 768, like this res not to small not to big. Ive got it on medium quality and NO AF or AA, though not sure what Doom 3 sets it at ? Iam using the Humus tweaks as well as some other tweaks using the Autoexec.cfg, my Vid card is also overclocked 23 before 28,30 after. Was going to get a new card now i dont thing i need to Using 4.9 offical ATI Catylast drivers. Cheers.
|
Yep. I get about 27-30 FPS at 1152x864 with high quality on my Athlon 2200+ XP, ATI Radeon 9800 Pro AIW (128 MB), 1 GB of RAM, etc. I still get choppy FPS here and there though. -- "Have I told you how much I like ants, huh? Especially fried in a subtle blend of mech fluid and grated gears?" --Rampage to Inferno, "Transmutate" in Transformers (Beast Wars) /\___/\ / /\ /\ \ Phillip (Ant) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx & http://aqfl.net | |o o| | E-mail: philpi@earthlink.netANT or ANTant@zimage.com \ _ / Nuke ANT from e-mail address if your e-mail was returned. ( )
|
I think it looks a lot better at 800*600 with 4xAA, using a similar system,
except xp2500 cpu.
30 in timedemo a bit low to play realistically. I tried the Humus and
various other tweaks, but only got a few FPS.
The best one I got was using optimize shadows, but this turns off some of
the lights, so moodily lit corners were totally dark, and its bad enough
with the whole flashlight-gun-flashlight-gun thing as it is (plus it
detracted from the atmosphere IMO).
I am just up the the decompiler? (big blue beam room), so I don't expect the
graphical situation to get any better later in the game.
|
|
|
|
 |
28 to 30 fps in timedemo Radeon 9600 Pro, this good ?  |
 |
09-17-2004, 08:23 AM
|
#4
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 54
|
28 to 30 fps in timedemo Radeon 9600 Pro, this good ?
I think it looks much better at 1600by1200 4XAA 16XAF
Or is that just me !!!
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:04:02 +0800, "Blahguy" <z@z.z> wrote:
Quote:
I think it looks a lot better at 800*600 with 4xAA<ANTant@zimage.com> wrote in messagenews:2fmdnRf6b9DWs9fcRVn-qg@mminternet.net...
Quote:
Little TeaPot <Scully@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
Quote:
Resolution 1024 by 768, like this res not to small not to big. Ive got it on medium quality and NO AF or AA, though not sure what Doom 3 sets it at ? Iam using the Humus tweaks as well as some other tweaks using the Autoexec.cfg, my Vid card is also overclocked 23 before 28,30 after. Was going to get a new card now i dont thing i need to Using 4.9 offical ATI Catylast drivers. Cheers.
|
Yep. I get about 27-30 FPS at 1152x864 with high quality on my Athlon 2200+ XP, ATI Radeon 9800 Pro AIW (128 MB), 1 GB of RAM, etc. I still get choppy FPS here and there though. -- "Have I told you how much I like ants, huh? Especially fried in a subtle blend of mech fluid and grated gears?" --Rampage to Inferno, "Transmutate" in Transformers (Beast Wars) /\___/\ / /\ /\ \ Phillip (Ant) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx & http://aqfl.net | |o o| | E-mail: philpi@earthlink.netANT or ANTant@zimage.com \ _ / Nuke ANT from e-mail address if your e-mail was returned. ( )
|
I think it looks a lot better at 800*600 with 4xAA, using a similar system,except xp2500 cpu.30 in timedemo a bit low to play realistically. I tried the Humus andvarious other tweaks, but only got a few FPS.The best one I got was using optimize shadows, but this turns off some ofthe lights, so moodily lit corners were totally dark, and its bad enoughwith the whole flashlight-gun-flashlight-gun thing as it is (plus itdetracted from the atmosphere IMO).I am just up the the decompiler? (big blue beam room), so I don't expect thegraphical situation to get any better later in the game.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
28 to 30 fps in timedemo Radeon 9600 Pro, this good ?  |
 |
09-17-2004, 10:47 AM
|
#5
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4
|
28 to 30 fps in timedemo Radeon 9600 Pro, this good ?
"Little TeaPot" <Scully@yahoo.com.au> skrev i en meddelelse
news  p3mk0182k9biqk892j8pqpu37jnr787ga@4ax.com...
Quote:
I think it looks much better at 1600by1200 4XAA 16XAF Or is that just me !!!
|
No!!!
You´re quite right about that!!!
Looks great !
Would like to go 2048x1536, but can´t see these jumpy spiders anymore...
My system:
PIII, low-end budget graphics cart and no clue
Greetz
Shy-dying fuck.
*Have a nice weekend!*
|
|
|
|
12-21-2006, 03:06 PM
|
#6
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1
|
Who can call me hot?
|
|
|
|
12-24-2006, 06:57 AM
|
#8
|
|
Junior Member
Status:
Offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1
|
Who can call me hot??!
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|
|
|